Monday, January 07, 2008

Bhutto Knew Too Much About Bin Laden, 911, the CIA

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

Bhutto's assassination by gun men was a pre-emptive strike! She might have exposed the CIA as the World's number one terrorist organization. Pakistan Dictator Pervez Musharraf, Bush's man in Pakistan, blames the victim. In some perverted sense, he may be right. Bhutto may have signed her own death warrant with the famous statement (censored by the BBC) that Bin Laden was murdered by Saeed Sheikh. [Her remarks found here]

Bhutto pulled the rug from under Bush's official 911 conspiracy theory. We must chalk up to official fraud and exploitation several "video tapes" that Bushies attributed to the world's arch fiend, Osama bin Laden, the Lex Luthor of terror. Bush critics are now confirmed; there is no reason to suppose that bin Laden ever stopped being a CIA asset. While alive, that is.
The assassination of Bhutto appears to have been anticipated. There were even reports of “chatter” among US officials about the possible assassinations of either Pervez Musharraf or Benazir Bhutto, well before the actual attempts took place.

As succinctly summarized in Jeremy Page’s article, "Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? The Main Suspects", the main suspects are 1) “Pakistani and foreign Islamist militants who saw her as a heretic and an American stooge”, and 2) the Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, a virtual branch of the CIA. Bhutto’s husband Asif Ali Zardari directly accused the ISI of being involved in the October attack.

The assassination of Bhutto has predictably been blamed on “Al-Qaeda”, without mention of fact that Al-Qaeda itself is an Anglo-American military-intelligence operation.

Page’s piece was one of the first to name the man who has now been tagged as the main suspect: Baitullah Mehsud, a purported Taliban militant fighting the Pakistani army out of Waziristan. Conflicting reports link Mehsud to “Al-Qaeda”, the Afghan Taliban, and Mullah Omar (also see here). Other analysis links him to the terrorist A.Q. Khan.

--Larry Chin, Anglo-American Ambitions behind the Assassination of Benazir Bhutto and the Destabilization of Pakistan

A sub plot is equally interesting. A former MI6/SIS agent, Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad, supervised wired transfers of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta shortly before 9/11. Has anyone ever stopped to ask the obvious question: what the hell was a man who was going to die in a suicide Attack do with $100,000?

According to Turkish intelligence, Ahmad is a paid CIA informant who claims to have trained six 9/11 hijackers. Turkish intelligence charges that Al-Qaeda is merely the name of a secret service operation designed to stir up trouble and exploit tensions around the world.
While the pakistani inter services public relations claimed that former ISI Director-General Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being superseded on monday, the truth is more shocking. top sources confirmed here on tuesday, that the general lost his job because of the "evidence" india produced to show his links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Centre.

The US authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that $100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker mohammed Atta from pakistan by ahmad Umarr Sheikh at the instance of gen mahumd. Senior government sources have confirmed that india contributed significantly to establishing the link between the money transfer and the role played by the dismissed ISI chief. while they did not provide details, they said that indian inputs, including sheikh’s mobile phone number, helped the FBI in tracing and establishing the link. a direct link between the ISI and the WTC Attack could have enormous repercussions. the us cannot but suspect whether or not there were other senior pakistani army commanders who were in the know of things.

Evidence of a larger conspiracy could shake us confidence in pakistan’s ability to participate in the anti-terrorism coalition. indian officials say they are vitally interested in the unravelling of the case since it could link the ISI directly to the hijacking of the indian airlines kathmandu-delhi flight to kandahar last december. ahmad umar sayeed sheikh is a british national and a london school of economics graduate who was arrested by the police in delhi following a bungled 1994 kidnapping of four westerners, including an american citizen.

--India helped FBI trace ISI-terrorist links

The London Times reports that from 1999-2000 Louai al-Sakka, incarcerated in a high-security Turkish prison 60 miles east of Istanbul, trained six 9/11 hijackers in a mountain camp near Istanbul. Sakka is said to have been captured by Turkish intelligence and ordered released. After moving to Germany, he assisted alleged 9/11 hijackers.

Shortly before 9/11, Sakka was allegedly hired by Syrian intelligence - to whom he gave a warning that the Attacks were coming on September 10th, 2001.

In the meantime, Wikipedia has this information about the man Bhutto claims murdered bin Laden.
" was arrested and served time in prison for the 1994 abduction of several British nationals in India, an act which he acknowledges, he was released from captivity in 1999 and provided safe passage into Pakistan, apparently with the support of Pakistan and the Taliban (the hijackers were Pakistanis) in an Indian Airlines plane hijacking. He is most well-known for his alleged role in the 2002 kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Sheikh Omar Saeed was arrested by Pakistani police on February 12, 2002, in Lahore, in conjunction with the Pearl kidnapping,[4] and was sentenced to death on July 15, 2002[5] for killing Pearl. His judicial appeal has not yet been heard. The delay has been alleged to be due to his reported links with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence.[6]

Pakistani President, Pervez Musharraf, in his book In the Line of Fire stated that Sheikh was originally recruited by British intelligence agency, MI6, while studying at the London School of Economics. He alleges Omar Sheikh was sent to the Balkans by MI6 to engage in jihadi operations. Musharraf later went on to state "At some point, he probably became a rogue or double agent".[7]

On October 6, 2001, a senior-level US government official told CNN that US investigators had discovered Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh (Sheik Syed), using the alias "Mustafa Muhammad Ahmad" had sent about $100,000 from the United Arab Emirates to Mohammed Atta. "Investigators said Atta then distributed the funds to conspirators in Florida in the weeks before the deadliest acts of terrorism on US soil that destroyed the World Trade Center, heavily damaged the Pentagon and left thousands dead. In addition, sources have said Atta sent thousands of dollars -- believed to be excess funds from the operation -- back to Saeed in the United Arab Emirates in the days before September 11. CNN later confirmed this. [1]"

-- Omar Saeed Sheikh
Much of this was known but little publicized by the MSM. Few journalists dared challenge official conspiracy theories. Among those daring to get at the truth was Gore Vidal.
Vidal argues that the real motive for the Afghanistan war was to control the gateway to Eurasia and Central Asia's energy riches. He quotes extensively from a 1997 analysis of the region by Zgibniew Brzezinski, formerly national security adviser to President Carter, in support of this theory. But, Vidal argues, US administrations, both Democrat and Republican, were aware that the American public would resist any war in Afghanistan without a truly massive and widely perceived external threat.

--Gore Vidal claims 'Bush junta' complicit in 9/11
It was not Bhutto who misspoke but Musharraf, whose comments may have already backfired. Indeed, Bhutto was murdered --not by terrorists as Musharraf would have you believe. She was murdered, gunned down, in fact, because she was the woman who knew too much and dared to reveal that Osama bin Laden had been murdered. She did not misspeak! She named names. She exposed the fraudulent nature of the Bush/Blair "war on terrorism". She stated --flat out --US policies cause world terrorism!

Musharraf just makes himself look worse with worse lies. As Bhutto's murderers were caught on video tape, the BBC was caught censoring a most important piece of the puzzle. If Osama is dead, Bush's war on terror is a treasonous fraud, a capital crime.
Was Afghanistan then turned to rubble in order to avenge the 3,000 Americans slaughtered by Osama? Hardly. The administration is convinced that Americans are so simple-minded that they can deal with no scenario more complex than the venerable lone, crazed killer (this time with zombie helpers) who does evil just for the fun of it 'cause he hates us, 'cause we're rich 'n free 'n he's not. Osama was chosen on aesthetic grounds to be the most frightening logo for our long contemplated invasion and conquest of Afghanistan, planning for which had been `contingency' some years before 9/11 and, again, from 20 December, 2000, when Clinton's out-going team devised a plan to strike at al-Qaeda in retaliation for the assault on the warship Cole.

--Gore Vidal, The Enemy Within

Two questions must be asked about the Bhutto assassination: 1) Who benefits from it? 2) Who is lying about it?

The most prominent liars are Pervez Musharraf who insists upon a ludicrous theory, easily disproven by widely distributed video tapes; and George W. Bush whose lies about "terrorism", bin Laden specifically, have been challenged as never before. If, as Bhutto charged, bin Laden is dead, the whole rotten edifice comes crashing down.

The beneficiaries are not suprisingly George W. Bush and Musharraf. Musharraf, like Bush, will now crack down on “terrorists” though the policies of both create it! Bhutto dared expose the fraud and paid with her life for having done so. The axis of Bush/CheneyMIC will prop up the dictator Musharraf, manipulating his apparatus of state to meet the demands of personal ambition and corporate greed. And, yes! All are oil and power mad!

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

INFORMATION PRESS - News Views Media - http://www.InformPress.com - USA

(1) Commando Musharraf Misused Pakistan Army's Rogue Commandos To Murder Benazir Bhutto

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/e3b6e60ae11c5d51

http://www.ppp.org.pk/news_event/jan/3-1-2008.html

(2) Pakistan Army's SSG Commandos Killed PPP Chief Benazir Bhutto

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/e27767c0a815e6a0

(3) Benazir Bhutto Named 3 PML-Q Terrorists in her Email to David Miliband

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/3180b6a08052f11b

(4) British Intelligence Service MI5 Says Pakistan Army's ISI Killed Benazir Bhutto

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/e77a8237d3907bb6

(5) ISI Murdered Benazir Bhutto to Keep Tyrant Mush in Power

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/3eebfbce36d904b9

(6) U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton Says Pakistan Army Killed PPP Chief Benazir Bhutto

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/9fd61328ec98cf60

(7) U.S. Intelligence Official Points Finger at the Musharraf Army

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/6459c07ed023b46c

(8) E-Mail of Benazir Bhutto Says Pervez Musharraf Killed PPP Chief

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/1616094e2c853db8

(9) Pervez Musharraf Blocked Security for Benazir Bhutto to Kill Her

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/81dc816c7bc8cd93

(10) Liar Musharraf Lies to Hide his Crimes

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/27f0de13e4b916cb

(11) U.S. NSA Exposes the Phone Recording Fraud of Criminal Liar Javed Iqbal Cheema

Telephone Recording Fraud of Pakistan Interior Ministry Exposed by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA)

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/b746c81d300333dd

(12) Baitullah Mehsud Did NOT Kill Benazir Bhutto: PPP Spokesman Farhatullah Babar

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/4de167fa37d89220

(13) Baitullah Mehsud Says Pervez Musharraf is the Real Killer of Benazir Bhutto

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/e4a860aa009993a2

(14) News Fraud of the Daily Times Exposed

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/851f65b20fd55ead

(15) Pervez Musharraf - the Mercenary of CIA, MI6, Mossad and RAW - is Destroying Pakistan

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/a9041dd3f4abd18e

(16) How to Reform the Government of Pakistan

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/4fde31d87fd409aa

(17) Benazir and PPP will Never Get Any Justice from the Military Dictatorship

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/a9076fbc4fb3f753

(18) When will President Bush Bring Terrorist Musharraf to Justice?

http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress/t/f6421629a4df3325

(19) Who Really Killed Benazir Bhutto?

DW: http://www.DictatorshipWatch.com

http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/index.php?module=News&catid=&topic=28

(20) INFORMATION PRESS - News Views Media - http://www.InformPress.com - USA

Unknown said...

I have lost patience with idiots who merely label people because they have no arguments, no facts, no intelligence.

If you come on my blog and try to get away with right wing bullshit ad hominem attacks, I will delete your sorry butt. I gave up on discussion with those types a long time ago. They belong to Carl Jung's "thirty percent" of any population that are certifiably NUTS.

The ad hominem attack du jour is "tin foil hat". Those who use it are 1) NOT original; 2) NOT creative (it's tired, worn out, old); 3)usually subscribers to the most absurd "conspiracy theories" of them all, the ones put forward by the GOP --which ought to be indicted by a Federal Grand jury for racketeering and fraud.

The GOP doesn't really not believe in conspiracy theories. Goppers love those conspiracies they can exploit, like wedge issues used to divide a "conspiratorial" opposition. Like Bush, the GOP loves conspiracy theories and have bought into every absurd theory Bush has managed to excrete and publicize.

What is Al Qaeda if not a "conspiracy"?

What is the "Axis of Evil" if not a conspiracy?

What was Hani Hanjour and Atta doing if not conspiring? Conspire is about all they could do. They most certainly could not have crashed airliners with uncanny precision. They most certainly could not have gotten on board an airliner without showing up on a flight manifest. In fact, they didn't. The implications are enormous.

They most certainly could not have subdued the crew and passengers with box cutters and/or pen knives. I've always found it interesting the conspiracists inside the venerable BBC and the Guardian turned up several "Islamic conspirators" who somehow survived the said crashes to gave interviews. It's amazing what dead conspirators are capable of doing. Did the America media touch this. Not a chance. Fox as well as the so-called "legitimate", mainstream media simply walked away from what should have been front-page, second coming headlines exposing the biggest government fraud ever perpetrated in the US.

Curious about how our esteemed system of justice feels about "conspiracy theories", I did a cursory net search. On Findlaw, I found well over 200 SCOTUS decisions having to do with "conspiracies" of one sort or another. Would some bright and informed right-winger, please inform the justices of the Supreme Court that conspiracies don't exist? It would save the aging justices a lot of work.

Go to Findlaw! You will find thousands of US Codes having to do with conspiracies. I also found hundreds, possibly thousands (I did not count) of articles by legal scholars having to do with conspiracies. I find it appalling that Congress would spend so much time passing laws having to do with things that do not exist!

Right wing idiots spent the better part of the 1950's warning us of a great world wide communist conspiracy. Now the same ilk, the same mentality is trying to convince us that conspiracies don't exist. You have a right to be confused. The right wing certainly is. The right wing has surely been drinking lead laced kool-aid, a practice known to kill brain cells. It was the same mentality that in the fifties tried to convince us that there was a nationwide, liberal conspiracy to lace municipal water supplies with flouride. There was --and it was a good thing, too. Otherwise, a lot of young, spiffy, buttoned-down conservatives would be toothless by now.

In the 50's right wing nuts and other idiots found a commie under every sofa when all the commies really wanted was a sofa under every commie. What was that if not a world-wide communist conspiracy? Today --the right wing is reduced to trying to convince us that there is a conspiracy of conspiracists to spread conspiracies.

So --unless you have something original, verifiable, or of substance to say, you will not get away with calling me or anyone posting here a "tin foil hatter". My suggestion to those folk is simply this: take a course in logic, critical thinking, philosophical analysis, or even criminal investigation. Failing that, talk to anyone who has ever served on a Federal Grand jury investigating organized crime. Ask them how they managed to pin raps on folk for "organized crime" when everyone knows that "conspiracies do not exist".

Failing everything else, get a fucking life!

Jolly Roger said...

Who knows, really? Bhutto is a name that earns you a lot of enmity in Pakistan.

I am certain many members of the military and ISI were anxious to see her offed. And of course our creation in the region, the Taliban, cannot abide a woman who doesn't suit up and shut up.

Her death was inevitable, and even she knew it. It's a family tradition, after all.