Thursday, August 28, 2008

Big Oil Exploits High Oil Prices

'Big Oil' has already despoiled millions of acres of pristine American wilderness. It's not enough to satisfy their rapacious greed and its not enough to satisfy the American consumer who demands the right to drive absurd environmentally unfriendly vehicles like SUVs on the cheap. Everything was fine as long as the gravy train seemed endless. Everyone wants to have it both ways. Certainly --big oil would not have gotten big or bigger without a seemingly endless supply of hypocrisy. The supply of oil, by contrast, is finite.
Did you know that oil companies are already sitting on 68 million acres of leases that they aren't even drilling? Which kind of makes you wonder: Why are Big Oil and its allies suddenly desperate to get their hands on the last few places that are still protected -- our natural treasures, wildlife refuges, and pristine coastlines? They wouldn't use the concerns caused by high gas prices as an excuse to grab it ALL, would they?

--Greg Haegele, Director of Conservation, Sierra Club
Big oil is eager to exploit the situation. When consumers are 'squeezed' by high prices at the pump, dumping the SUV has not been enough. Big oil --citing high prices from which they benefited --pushes a new PR offensive with an internet campaign the Sierra Club says are outright lies.
In April and May, House and Senate committees called industry executives on the carpet for hearings, and earlier this month Congress took another run at imposing a windfall profits tax on the five major US oil companies, which together made a record $36 billion in the first quarter of 2008.

But the windfall profits bill—which also included measures to rescind some $17 billion in industry tax breaks—died a swift death in the Senate, garnering 51 votes, but not enough to overcome a filibuster. (The president also vowed to veto it.) And the hearings themselves amounted to little more than political theater, allowing members of Congress to talk tough on behalf of their suffering constituents without demanding anything that would make the lineup of oil execs—from Exxon, BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and Shell—break a sweat.

--Mother Jones, America, Over Big Oil's Barrel
Big Oil wants to drill in wilderness areas and additional areas offshore and will try to buy a Presidential candidate if that it what it takes.
Oil and gas industry executives and employees donated $1.1 million to McCain last month -- three-quarters of which came after his June 16 speech calling for an end to the ban -- compared with $116,000 in March, $283,000 in April and $208,000 in May.

McCain said the policy reversal came as a response to rising voter anger over soaring energy prices. At the time, about three-quarters of voters responding to a Washington Post-ABC News poll said prices at the pump were causing them financial hardship, the highest in surveys this decade.

Opening vast stretches of the country's coastline to oil exploration would help America eliminate its dependence on foreign oil, McCain said.

"We have untapped oil reserves of at least 21 billion barrels in the United States. But a broad federal moratorium stands in the way of energy exploration and production," he said. "It is time for the federal government to lift these restrictions."

McCain delivered the speech before heading to Texas for a series of fundraisers with energy industry executives, and the day after the speech he raised $1.3 million at a private luncheon and reception at the San Antonio Country Club, according to local news<>

"The timing was significant," said David Donnelly, the national campaigns director of the Public Campaign Action Fund, a nonpartisan campaign finance reform group that conducted the analysis of McCain's oil industry contributions. "This is a case study of how a candidate can change a policy position in the interest of raising money."

Washington Post
Americans are squeezed at the pump. Jobs are scarce, if at all, and often miles from home. Millions of Americans, through no fault of their own, have no choice but to commute long distances to jobs and, given the GOP economy, think themselves lucky to have one. At the same time, they are squeezed by high prices at the pump. Big Oil can be counted on to find an opportunity in a crisis, a silver lining that will only make them richer at your expense and that of the environment. It's not only the US that is targeted by the robber barons of big oil.
LONDON, Aug 14 (Reuters) - A race to grab land in developing countries and exploit food supply fears and payments to conserve forests could spark conflicts in areas of land disputes, development and civil rights groups say.

Investors say higher land valuations are just what's needed to settle claims which may have festered since colonial days.

But much marginal and forested land is common property, which in the past has given poor local communities little benefit from logging, mining and oil concessions.

"No-man's land and hinterland is suddenly valuable," said Andy White, coordinator for the Washington-based Rights and Resources Initiative, a development NGO.

"Communities had been told the land was theirs. Now it's contested," he said, explaining that a community in Liberia had told him that in one week they had separate visits from a mining company, a logging company and a biofuel company. "They were told by the government -- 'go out and prospect'."

--Reuters, "Green" land grab could sow seeds of new conflict
Big Oil's long-term drilling agenda is a Faustian bargain. There is only one environment. Riches today and to hell with the morrow is a fool's bargain. Big oil wants you to make it! Fact is --more drilling will neither lower the price you pay at the pump nor will it make the US energy independent. Like a druggie, this is just another short term 'fix' and only the world's richest oil companies will get even richer. Funny how it always seems to work out that way. One day, the US consumer will 'get it'!

In the meantime, The Nation, in an open letter to Barack Obama, has published some of the key points that must be addressed if the nation is ever to recover.
Here are key positions you have embraced that we believe are essential to sustaining this movement:
  • § Withdrawal from Iraq on a fixed timetable.
  • § A response to the current economic crisis that reduces the gap between the rich and the rest of us through a more progressive financial and welfare system; public investment to create jobs and repair the country's collapsing infrastructure; fair trade policies; restoration of the freedom to organize unions; and meaningful government enforcement of labor laws and regulation of industry.
  • § Universal healthcare.
  • § An environmental policy that transforms the economy by shifting billions of dollars from the consumption of fossil fuels to alternative energy sources, creating millions of green jobs.
  • § An end to the regime of torture, abuse of civil liberties and unchecked executive power that has flourished in the Bush era.
  • § A commitment to the rights of women, including the right to choose abortion and improved access to abortion and reproductive health services.
  • § A commitment to improving conditions in urban communities and ending racial inequality, including disparities in education through reform of the No Child Left Behind Act and other measures.
  • § An immigration system that treats humanely those attempting to enter the country and provides a path to citizenship for those already here.
  • § Reform of the drug laws that incarcerate hundreds of thousands who need help, not jail.
  • § Reform of the political process that reduces the influence of money and corporate lobbyists and amplifies the voices of ordinary people.

Published Articles

Subscribe



GoogleYahoo!AOLBloglines

Download DivX

Add to Technorati Favorites

, , ,

Spread the word

yahoo icerocket pubsub newsvine

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

EB, I like your blog, your slightly snarky attitude and the links to non-BS news. Keep up the good work.

One point though, at the end of your recent post you list the several topics the post is referenced by: 'Bush', 'GOP', 'evil', 'tyranny'.

Isn't that somewhat redundant?

Unknown said...

markh sez...

One point though, at the end of your recent post you list the several topics the post is referenced by: 'Bush', 'GOP', 'evil', 'tyranny'.

LOL Indeed, it is!! And some people have STILL not gotten the point.

Thanks for the comments and the 'snarky' attitude.

Anonymous said...

I think this drill/lease grab is just the oil companies securing what they believe is their due. As we slowly shift (with the dems it will happen sooner) to alternatives, the oil companies will stop being the middle men they have turned into, and begin to pump their own oil, even if it is for future export. If we become in ten to twenty years, more or less self sufficient, the oil companies know there will be no incentive for American military presence as we now have in the middle east, their gig is up for the most part.

Maybe if they had not been greedy, arrogant assholes they could have continued a win/win business relationship with the oil producing countries. It appears that time has long passed, and the welcome has been very much ago worn out, practically from the start. Unfortunately, they followed in the imperial foots steps of the British in manner and method, who have been fucking it up in the middle east for over a century now.

As usual, some sort of "crisis" real or imagined had to come along, and with the type of corporatist government exceedingly exists in Washington, (it does not get much worse then the Bush/co) we get the knee jerk pro-corporate expansion. Of course every day and all day the "pundits" repeated the gop mantra of "drill, drill drill", and the fact that "a majority" 70%+ of the American people were for more drilling, so say the media sponsored polls...and after days of pro drilling propaganda.

I do believe if the Obama camp gets inside, much of this nonsense will cease, but that in it's self is a forgone conclusion for now. The gop will do very little in the way of alternative energy resource development, it will be left in the hands of "the market"...that is no guess or speculation, that is their current and on going policy, period.

benmerc

Unknown said...

benmerc sez...

Maybe if they had not been greedy, arrogant assholes they could have continued a win/win business relationship with the oil producing countries.

Greed and arrogance are characteristic of rapidly expanding, boom businesses. When PA soon exhausted itself, the desparate search for oil zeroed in on Texas with the almost accidental discovery of oil at Spindletop. Oil was literally oozing up out of the ground. Getting rich was easy. Just punch a hole and watch it gush up. The mad scamble for oil and riches moved throughout East Texas. Among the more notorious 'headquarters' was a wide place in the road called appropriately "pistol hill". Many a life was snuffed there because of oil and greed. "Pistol Hill" still exists but is called "Laird Hill" now.

It was mere PR. "Oil men" are still killing folk for oil. Just ask the relatives of over one million Iraqi civilians who have been murdered by George W. Bush. I am quite sure that JFKs threat to abolish the oil depletion allowance helped seal his fate and helped the greed oil baron form a coalition wiht US imperialists that still back the Bush clan and similar ilk today.

A one time mayor of Houston (Fred Hofheinz, son of the man who built the astrodome) once told a news conference that I attended: 'There is something rotten in Houston!'. He was right. It was oil! And it is still a rotten, corrupt and greedy business.

I do believe if the Obama camp gets inside, much of this nonsense will cease, but that in it's self is a forgone conclusion for now.

Powerful, ruthless conservative forces will oppose Obama with the same vehemence that JFK was opposed. I will say this: Obama's speech was among the three finest speeches that I have heard in my life time. The other two were Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" and JFKs Inaugural "Ask Not What Your Country can do for you..." A bit later, I heard Stokely Carmichael address a PACKED audience at Cullen Auditorium on the University of Houston campus. Stokely's address that night electrified the audience. He pledged to radicalize every campus in the nation. He might have succeeded had the leaders of a generational movement, transcending race and class had not been cut down in their primes by 'lone assassins'!!